The health bill and banking

Bank of North Dakota drew an interesting distinction, earning a carve out in the health care reform reconciliation bill. Politico has the story. Snippet:

“There is a provision in the reconciliation bill that shields the Bank of North Dakota from new restrictions on private student loan companies.

The bank is a nonprofit, and the only one in the country owned by a state. Given the unique status of the bank, it will be exempted under the reconciliation bill.”

President Obama tried to defuse some of the hotter allegations about political deal making in the health care reform debate during his contentious interview with Brett Baer of Fox News, saying, for instance, that some of the perceived sweetness of the so-called Louisiana Purchase applied not just to Louisiana but to any state that was recovering from a natural catastrophe: he instanced Hawaii. North Dakota Senator Kent Conrad made a similar point about the student loan rules for banks. Again, from Politico:

“It would apply…to every state. Any state that has an institution like this would be exempt.”

Conrad and his colleagues allow, however, that Bank of North Dakota is “a unique situation.”

A regional news roundup

Dave Nelson, longtime Wells Fargo and Norwest executive, will leave his post as president of Wells Fargo, Rochester, Minn., to become chairman and CEO of West Bank, and president/CEO of West Bancorporation, Des Moines. The Des Moines Register has the story. Here is the bank’s announcement.

The Bank of North Dakota is getting a lot of attention, not just from the Associated Press, but from politicians in California, Florida, Michigan, New Mexico, Ohio, Oregon and Washington state who wonder whether state-owned banks might be good for their states.

While we’re on the subject of banks with unique ownership structures, Stan Dardis, longtime CEO of St. Paul-based Bremer Bank will retire next month. Here is a profile of Dardis and his successor Pat Donovan. A snippet from Dardis:

“We make our way not through Wall Street, but through Main Street. We do business in our local markets, not in Chicago or New York. Our business is to serve the local communities where we have banks. This approach has served us well during good times and bad.”

Some indicators and economists say recovery has taken hold

Economic activity in the manufacturing sector expanded in February for the seventh consecutive month, and the factory employment index rose for the third straight month, according to the Institute for Supply Management’s February report, which was released yesterday.

The Mid-America survey of supply managers in Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota and South Dakota (as well as Arkansas and Oklahoma), also released yesterday, rose to its highest level since April of 2007. “It was a quite unexpected, for me, increase; the number was well above growth neutral,” said Prof. Ernie Goss, who runs the survey from Creighton University. Check out his YouTube clip here.

Clare Zempel, an economist and founder of Zempel Strategic, recently told a gathering of Wisconsin bankers that the global economic recovery is well underway and he sees no chance of a double dip. “There’s a lot of hard evidence that the process of recovery has taken hold and taken hold dramatically,” Zempel said.

Read much more about this in the March 15 edition of NorthWestern Financial Review.

Midwestern farmland values holding up in recession

The March 1 edition of NorthWestern Financial Review includes an ag-industry outlook featuring analysis from Prof. Ernie Goss of Creighton University, Jeff Wolfgram of Dakota MAC and Dave Cebulla of UMACC and Pine Country Bank. One indication of relative stability in the ag economy is that Midwestern farmland values have held up pretty well through the recession; Goss and Wolfgram both emphasize this point in our story.

Last week the Chicago Fed released new figures on seventh district farmland values. The district as a whole posted a 2 percent increase for 2009, driven by gains of 7 percent in Indiana, 4 percent in Iowa and 2 percent in Illinois. Wisconsin farmland values fell by 1 percent, and Michigan values declined by 6 percent.

Quarterly report says banking lags broader rebound

The FDIC released its quarterly banking profile today. Chairman Bair’s press conference is here. The profile itself is here. Some highlights:

  • The industry “essentially [broke] even” in fourth quarter, earning just less than $1 billion. Even that weak aggregate earning figure “represents significant improvement” over the record loss of a year ago, Bair said.
  • Key factors in the year-to-year improvement were interest income, non-interest expenses and lower loan-loss provisions.
  • Nevertheless, about one in three insured institutions reported a net loss for the fourth quarter.
  • Non-current loans continued to rise, albeit at a slower pace — the third consecutive quarter in which non-currents rose at slower rates.
  • 45 banks failed in the fourth quarter, driving the year-end total to 140, the highest annual total since 1992.
  • All loan categories had declining balances in 2009. Total loans fell by 7.5 percent, the largest full-year decline since 1942.
  • The problem-bank list topped 700.

Kocherlakota analyzes economy, touts Fed’s role in supervision

Narayana Kocherlakota addressed the Minnesota Bankers Association yesterday, in his first public speech since taking over as president of the Minneapolis Fed last October. Kocherlakota said a “nascent recovery is under way,” and he expects the recovery to continue with 3 percent growth over the next two years. He characterized his forecast as a little more pessimistic than the FOMC’s, which expects growth of 3 percent this year and 4 percent next year.

Political uncertainty is a factor in his lower forecast:

“There is a great deal of political uncertainty related to major policy initiatives underway in Washington. Congress is considering proposals for enormous changes in health care and in the structure of financial regulation…[and] the capricious winds of politics seem to change them on a near-daily basis.”

Kocherlakota expressed concern about the nation’s unemployment rate and discussed scenarios that could cause inflation to rise:

“Deposit institutions are holding over a trillion dollars of excess reserves (that is, over 15 times what they are required to hold given their deposits). These excess reserves create the potential for high inflation. Suppose that households believe that prices will rise. They would then demand more deposits to use for transactions…these extra deposits become extra money chasing the same amount of goods and so generate upward pressure on prices.”

He hastened to add, and to emphasize, that he did not expect high inflation to set in:

“We would need a combination of bad monetary policy and poor fiscal management. I do not foresee this combination as likely to occur.”

Kocherlakota waded into the debate about limiting the Fed’s supervisory role, saying that its firsthand knowledge of banks helped the Fed react to the financial crisis. Kocherlakota said the Fed “has every incentive to do a good job in assessing the borrower quality” before extending a loan through the discount window or programs like the Term Auction Facility; if the loan goes bad the loss is on the Fed’s balance sheet.

“Suppose instead that some other agency were responsible for providing this information to the Federal Reserve. What exactly are this other agency’s incentives to provide…the best possible information? This other agency is not going to suffer a loss for making a bad loan–the Federal Reserve is.”

He also noted that the Fed’s supervisory experience gave it the scope to conduct last year’s stress tests of the country’s 19 largest banks, something no other “institution in the government would have the kind of collective expertise to orchestrate.”

NFIB pans Washington’s response to recession

The commentary section of NFIB’s monthly analysis of business trends opens with a simple declaration: “Washington still does not get it.” But that’s mere throat clearing. After pointing out how politicians talk about small business’s crucial role in employment, NFIB’s William Dunkleberg and Holly Wade make the following (selected) observations:

“When it comes time to provide help, small business gets $30 billion IF banks decide to accept the TARP funds to support loans and IF the owners can subsequently get a loan from a bank. But for most firms, this dinky amount is of little help…

“…Plans for capital expenditures and inventory investment among small firms are at 35 year lows. Even large bank CEOs now admit loan demand is weak! ‘Stimulus’ for this administration has not focused on supporting consumer spending nor been designed with a sense of urgency…Instead, Congress is focusing on a health care bill that features crippling taxes and mandates for small firms…

“The National Bureau of Economic Research is expected to declare a recession bottom in the second half of 2009…NFIB indicators do not appear to agree however. At the end of the 1982 recession (Q4, 1982), the [Optimism] Index value was 98, the percent of owners viewing that period as a good time to expand was nine percent and the net percent expecting better business conditions was 47 percent. The [most recent Optimism Index] value is 89.3, the percent of owners viewing the current period as a good time to expand is five percent and only a net one percent expect better business conditions in the first half, not really strong signs of a turn in the economy.”

Quote of the week–maybe of the whole crisis

Several reviews of On the Brink, the new book by former Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, pick up on an anecdote about a dinner party where Chuck Prince, former Citigroup CEO, gave a glimpse not just of his anxiety about Citi’s investment activities but also of his bank’s dependence on government guidance. Prince is quoted as saying:

“Isn’t there something you can do to order us not to take all of these risks?”

We know it’s wrong but we just can’t stop. Don’t over-regulate us, but do save us from ourselves.